Accessibility statement

Last updated: 2026-08-14

We want Mind Guard 365 to be usable by as many people as possible, including people who use assistive technology. Accessibility is an ongoing effort and we keep working to improve it.

Our aim

We aim to meet the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 at level AA across our website and mobile app where practical. For users in the United States we also work towards alignment with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 508 expectations.

What we do

Screen reader support: interactive elements have text labels and roles so they can be read by screen readers such as VoiceOver and TalkBack.
Colour contrast: we choose text and control colours that aim to meet AA contrast ratios in both light and dark themes.
Scalable text: the app supports your device font-size settings so you can make text larger.
Plain language: we write in clear, calm, everyday English and avoid jargon and clinical terms.
Reduced cognitive load: we keep screens focused, break tasks into small steps and avoid long dense blocks of text.
Accessible navigation: consistent layout, clear headings and a skip-to-content link on the website.

Recognised app design standards we build against

We build Mind Guard 365 against recognised app design and accessibility standards. We do not claim certification against any of these; the wording below is what we build against, not what we are audited to.

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 level AA. Applied to both the marketing website and the mobile app UI where the underlying platform allows equivalent semantics. See WCAG 2.1.
Apple Human Interface Guidelines. Applied on iOS for navigation, controls, typography and motion. See Apple HIG.
Android core app quality guidelines and Material Design. Applied on Android for layout, navigation, dark theme, back-behaviour and accessibility. See Android core app quality and Material 3.
User feedback in design and testing. Design changes are shaped by paraphrased, anonymised feedback from real users; the change log is published on our approach and evidence page.

Known limitations

We are honest that some areas are still being improved. We are reviewing colour contrast on a small number of secondary elements, refining focus order in a few flows and expanding test coverage with assistive technology. If something does not work for you, please tell us.

Giving feedback

If you have trouble using any part of Mind Guard 365, or you would like content in a different format, please contact us at privacy@mindguard365.com. Tell us what you were trying to do and the device or assistive technology you use, and we will do our best to help and to fix the issue.